For engineering and manufacturing employers, the message is clear: quality, employer voice and occupational competence remain central – but the way assessments are structured and delivered is evolving.
Here is what matters most.
Employers Remain Central to Occupational Competence
Skills England has reiterated that employers are the occupational experts and will continue to play a defining role in:
- Developing and refining occupational standards
- Shaping Apprenticeship Assessment Plans (AAPs)
- Contributing to assessment material design and review
- Providing feedback through stakeholder surveys
Assessment outcomes will continue to be based on occupational standards. All outcomes must still be assessed every time, even where sampling approaches are used.
This is particularly important for safety-critical sectors such as engineering and manufacturing.
Safeguards on Quality and Consistency
Concerns about variation across assessment organisations and geography have been addressed through:
- Interim “General Requirements for Apprenticeship Assessment” guidance
- Continued regulation by Ofqual, OfS and industry bodies
- Mandatory assessment methods
- Clear performance descriptors for pass and distinction
- Defined assessment outcomes aligned to employer expectations
The principle remains: apprentices must demonstrate full occupational competence.
For engineering employers working in regulated or safety-critical environments, this reassurance is significant.
Behaviour Verification Shifts to Employers
One notable change is the removal of duplicate behavioural assessment by assessment organisations.
Employers will now verify behaviours directly in the workplace as part of normal performance management and gateway to completion.
Importantly:
- Employers will not be required to undertake formal skills assessments
- Guidance on behavioural verification is expected in Spring 2026
This change reduces duplication but does increase the need for robust internal processes.
Funding and the Growth & Skills Levy
Funding bands are not currently being reduced. However:
- The funding methodology is under review
- Further detail is expected later this year
- The growth and skills levy will replace the apprenticeship levy
For employers, this reinforces the importance of understanding both compliance and strategic workforce planning.
Practical Advice for Employers
Our advice to employers is:
Engage early.
Speak to your training provider and relevant sector bodies to stay informed.
Review internal processes.
Ensure your organisation is ready to verify behaviours and contribute meaningfully to assessment design where appropriate.
Build a transition plan.
Map what changes may impact your current apprentices and future cohorts.
Get involved.
Join an employer panel or contribute to the Skills England stakeholder survey to ensure engineering and manufacturing voices are represented.
At Next Gen Makers, we exist to ensure engineering apprenticeship schemes are not just compliant, but robust, high quality and aligned to best practice.
These reforms make three things even more important:
- Clear internal accountability for behaviours and gateway readiness
- Strong employer engagement in assessment design
- Structured review of apprenticeship processes against recognised standards
Through our Engineering Apprenticeships: Best Practice Programme and Employer Accreditation pathway, we help organisations:
- Benchmark their scheme against sector best practice
- Prepare for assessment reform
- Strengthen internal governance and oversight
- Demonstrate quality to future apprentices, schools and stakeholders
In a period of reform, quality employers will stand out.
Want to Assess Your Readiness?
If you are unsure how prepared your apprenticeship scheme is for these reforms, we recommend starting with our Apprentice Scheme Self Assessment
It provides an immediate indication of where your programme sits against sector standards and highlights areas to strengthen.
Engineering employers who engage early will be best positioned to lead the next phase of apprenticeship quality.

